Module Five Case Study Analysis Rubric

Short Paper

• 
• 
  
• 
  

ACC 207 Module Five Case Study Analysis Rubric

Prompt:  Create a short case study report summarizing your research of a reimbursement-related contract dispute between the U.S. government and a contractor. Your report should include the following: the reason for and nature of the contract, a summary of the outcome of the dispute, and a conclusion presenting your overall analysis of the allegations, dispute, and outcome.

Format:  This short paper assignment should follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA style.  Page length requirements: 1-–2 pages, not including the cover page or the reference page.  Failure to adhere to these submission requirements of submission will result in the inappropriate components not being graded.

Instructor Feedback: Students can find feedback in the Grade Center or Turnitin.

Critical Elements	Exemplary	Proficient	Needs Improvement	Not Evident	Value
Dispute	Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides specific and relevant details to support explanation (18-20)	Accurately identifies and explains a contract dispute between the U.S. government and a contractor, and addresses the reason and nature of the contract (16-17)	Does not sufficiently explains and identify a contract dispute between the U.S. government and a contractor (14-15)	Does not correctly identify a contract dispute between the U.S. government and a contractor (0-13)	20
Outcome	Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides relevant details to support the reason for the outcome (27-30)	Accurately describes the outcome of the contract dispute (24-26)	Does not sufficiently describe the outcome of the contract dispute (21-23)	Does not correctly describe the outcome of the contract dispute (0-20)	30
Conclusions	Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses clear and relevant examples to support the implications for reimbursement contracts (27-30)	Analyzes the contract dispute and explains its implications for reimbursement contracts (24-26)	Analyzes the contract dispute but does not sufficiently explain the implications for reimbursement contracts (21-23)	Does not analyze the contract dispute and its implications (0-20)	30
Articulation of Response	Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax, and is presented in a professional and easy to read format (18-20)	Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (16-17)	Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (14-15)	Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas (0-14)	20
Earned Total Comments:					100%

Get Professional Help with Your Research Essay Paper Today From Our Student Essay Service!