Symbolic Logic I
Question 1: What is the mehod of reductio ad absurdum and why does it work?Question 2:Construct a proof for the following argument. You may use either direct proof, conditional proof, or reductio ad absurdum.
1. O • I
2. O → (S v G)
3. I → ~G ∴ S
Question 3:Construct a proof for the following argument. You may use either direct proof, conditional proof, or reductio ad absurdum.
1.~A
2. (~A v M) → P
3. ~B ↔ (M • ~P) ∴ B
Question 4 :What, exactly, is the position of the mechanical jurist and how does the mechanical jurist believe legal reasoning relates to logical reasoning? Why might someone be attracted to such a view?

No comments:
Post a Comment